TRICKLE-DOWN ADVERTISING

 


When I was a junior copywriter at BMP, I wanted to know how advertising worked.


In fact did it work at all?


Sure everyone liked the ads, they were entertaining.


But I never knew anyone who’d seen an ad and gone out and bought something as a direct result.


So why did people pay us to do it?


My mum was a typical housewife, so I thought I’d start there.


So I said, “Mum, why do you always buy Cadbury’s chocolate instead of anyone else’s?”


She thought for a bit, and she said, “I don’t know. It’s got a good name hasn’t it? You see a lot of it around. It’s well known. I suppose they must have a reputation to protect.”


But that can’t be all there is to it, can it?


Because, for a start, Mum didn’t represent every consumer.


She was female, C2D, age 70+.


Her demographic obviously didn’t represent AB’s, or 16-44s, or males, for a start.


But there was something more important to be learned from that chat.


Mum had revealed she was very affected by what other people thought.


That made her an opinion-follower, not an opinion-former.


In fact, most of the population are opinion-followers.


So to get to people like Mum was an expensive proposition.


You would need a massive budget, millions and millions.


So what do we do if we haven’t got a massive budget?


We use trickle-down advertising.


We talk to the people that opinion-followers, follow.


We talk to opinion-formers.


Obviously there are far fewer of these.


But, just as obviously, one opinion-former may affect dozens of opinion-followers.


So it makes more sense to spend our advertising money there.


Triggering these people to create free media.


That’s why opinion-former advertising can work in a market that seems to be made up overwhelmingly of opinion-followers.


Not always of course.


But we need to have that conversation before we start, instead of knee jerking into the same old solution.


Just by having the debate you’ll uncover more effective solutions.


Take media for car insurance, for instance.


If you want older, down-market, opinion-followers, you advertise on daytime TV with a phone number at the end.


These people are either unemployed or retired, so that’s where you find them.


And they aren’t comfortable on the Internet.


So you give them a number where they can talk to someone.


But if you want younger, upmarket, opinion-formers, you advertise in the evening with a website at the end.


These people are working during the day, so you reach them at night.


And they’re too busy to spend ages on the phone discussing it.


So you give them a web address they can just click on.


Something else I learned when I was a junior copywriter at BMP.


The people you think you’re talking to may not really be the people you’re advertising to.


Like all juniors I had to do lots of trade ads.


You can learn a lot about how advertising really works from doing trade ads.


Take beer accounts, I did lots of salesman’s brochures.


These were little leaflets for the sales-force to show to publicans.


There’s a simple equation here.


If pubs don’t stock our beer we won’t sell any.


If they do we will.


So these little leaflets had to persuade the publican to stock our beer.


There was always a DPS about how our beer was “BACKED UP BY A MULTI-MILLION POUND TV ADVERTISING CAMPAIGN”


Usually the brochure was done before the TV campaign.


So we never had any pictures to show.


But it didn’t matter.


The publicans didn’t really care what the advertising was.


Just that it was a “multi-million pound TV advertising campaign”.


Just the fact that we had advertising made them stock it.


And the fact that they stocked it made it sell.


So actually, a lot of the multi-million pound advertising campaigns are really trade ads.


They work just by increasing distribution.


When you understand who you’re really talking to and why, you can put up a much better argument for your work.


You can explain why running a campaign that gets into the language makes financial sense.


Then it isn’t just a vanity project to try to win an award.


Now there’s a reason it needs to be the way it is.



And now you have a much better chance of getting good work to run.

  • Grilla Login

    The multi-million campaign that could live, or die, on the say so of the teenage son of the Head of Brand. There are a multitude of masters to please, aren’t there Dave? That anything half-decent sneaks thru is the surprise.

  • Dave Trott

    Grilla,
    I always think information is power.
    The more you know, the more chance you’ve got of getting the result you want.
    If you know more about the client’s problems than even the client does, you’ve got a better chance of arguing them into running your ads.
    And we all want our ads to see the light of day.
    I’m a pragmatist.

  • Grilla Login

    Dave, so am I.

    So, the name and address of the school the key decision makers children attend is top of my list of information to have.

    No’s and maybe’s suddenly turn into yes’s.

    Only time it doesn’t work is when they don’t have children at school; but a pet cat, dog, goldfish can mean a lot to a person too…

  • John W.

    Phone nos and websites. Does that gubbins have to be on ads these days?
    Can’t the punter just chase down the product/brand themselves. Why do they have to be directed? They aren’t that dumb…are they?

  • Jayne Marar

    knowledge is power, ask any politician.
    knowledge is freedom, ask any thinker.

    the hairdressers in The Tipping Point,
    are a great example of the trickle effect.

    bribing your clients therapist,
    is also a good way to get results :)

  • paulc-c

    When I worked on Grant’s whisky we would stealth research the routes that the major buyers & key decision makers for the On/Off trade took to get to work. Poster sites (1 or 2) were then bought throughout the year so they always saw our ‘multi million pound’ campaigns. If they moved home, we found new sites.

  • Dave Trott

    Paulc-c, that’s the sort of thinking I’m talking about.

  • Jack Harding

    I totally agree with Mr Trott. Targeting opinion formers (only we call them passionates) is the standard approach here at Jack Morton. We work on the basis that it’s much much more effective to ignite a few fo the right people to spread the word for the brand, than to try to reach your whole audience directly. However, my feeling is making this argument is not the real battle. Teh realm battle is identifyign who the opinion formers are. We need to start doing research in a way that uncovers this properly. To my knowledge, this isn’t happening yet.

  • Dave Trott

    Hi Jack,
    I agree, the real problem is recruitment.
    Try this link:
    http://www.cstadvertising.com/blog/2008/08/creative-planning/

  • Kevin Gordon

    Hi Dave,

    I’ve done something disgraceful.
    I’ve asked for my naff job back and I’ve got it.
    (Hence the delay).

    I’ve never ever done that in my life.
    But it was the right thing to do
    and I’ve learnt a lot in doing so.

    When I pitched for the launch of Lakeside, we had this exact conversation.

    Tony Clifford, ex-media director at JWT just said to me, advertise to the leaders
    and the followers will follow, and wasn’t he right! We created a 23 mile tail-back on the M25 all over Christmas. So then the next problem was frustrated shoppers and a very frustrated Essex Traffic Police Force.

    We ran a radio ad from the centre manager informing the customers when was the best time to get a parking space…and would you believe it? they did exactly what we suggested. The Centre’s retailers were delighted. The tills rang with cash non-stop over Christmas to the point that in four months of trading the centre had covered all its construction costs in relation to turnover, including the advertising budget which was less than 1% of the construction cost of £360m. We even won a commendation from Essex Police!@?*

    Occasionally trickle-downs become cascades as you pointed-out with NS&i campaign. A phenomenal success.

  • http://www.interacter.co.uk Neil Hopkins

    This principle holds true for everything, from technology to holidays to advertising.

    The adventurers go and do it, tell the lesser-adventurers who go and do it, who come home and tell Mrs Jones over the fence that they’ve done it, and if they’ve done it, she knows she can do it becuase, let’s face it, they’re not the most adventurous of people, are they?

    We use this tactic a lot in creating behavioural change in younger drivers, and are now rolling it into the older drivers market. It’s tried, it’s tested and, if you get the right people, it is more effective than anything else.

Campaign Jobs